Commentary – Lyon County Sheriff’s political maneuvering an insult to Lyon County residents

Lyon County Sheriff badge pic

Lyon County Sheriff’s political maneuvering an insult to Lyon County residents.

The recent request from Lyon County Sheriff Alan Veil to eliminate two appointive positions and create two new lieutenant positons (Lyon County Employees protected by the Sheriff’s Employees Association) is unabashed politics at its worst. But Veil’s confrontational, antagonistic tirade in front of the Commissioners on December 18, 2014 was not exactly a new and unusual scenario for the retiring Sheriff.

First, let’s deal with the current situation, taking the politics and egos out of the picture to make it simple and clear.

The two positions Sheriff Veil now wants to eliminate on his own volition (Under-Sheriff and Field Services Director) are appointive positions.

When the current Undersheriff and the current Field Services Director agreed to serve in these appointive positions they most certainly were aware they were accepting the status of “at will” employees. In other words, if their elected leader were to change, new leadership could replace these employees “at will”, with no requirement to abide by the employees association rules governing terminations.

These two employees, by originally leaving their positions within the “protected” ranks of the Sheriff’s Association, took a risk and now, with the results of the recent elections obviously putting the two appointive positions at risk, want to be back in the ‘protected’ realm of the Sheriff’s Association employees.

And not just any position. They want two new positions created just for them and want the taxpayers of Lyon County to support the two new high-level Sheriff’s Association positions (Lieutenants) just for them.

(Editor’s note: The official notices from the Sheriff’s and Under Sheriff’s office requesting these two position eliminations and ‘voluntary’ demotions included a request to restore these two employees to their former Lieutenant positions, one of which has since been eliminated. There are currently no vacancies in the Lieutenant ranks.)

County policy clearly states any departmental addition or elimination of positions or reorganization must be approved by the Board of Commissioners. Sheriff Veil claims he is not governed by this County policy. And, he assumed he should be able to appoint whomever he wanted to these new positions, no application process required for these hirings.

Imagine an elected State Constitutional Officer, such as the Governor, filling his appointive positions (his aides) – and then, a few months before leaving office, eliminating these positions and creating new public service employee positions (Nevada State Employees) and simply appointing his former aides to them…..all without going through an application process or to the legislature for approval of the new positions.

I think you can clearly see the above scenario is illegal and could not happen. It should not be expected for the Lyon County Sheriff to be able to do so, either!

Ask yourself, should appointed aides to elected officials expect to keep those positions when that elected official leaves his/her office – particularly if there is a sharp philosophical policy division between the outgoing and incoming elected official?

The current Sheriff has a history of challenging the obvious. Let me remind you of a few past confrontations between Sheriff Veil and the BOC:

  • The 2014-15 Sheriff’s Department proposed budget (As explained in a previous NewsDesk article)

The 2014 budget season was barely getting started when Lyon County Sheriff Alan Veil started it off with a challenging and loud salvo over the bow of the County decision makers’ balance sheets.

As one of the most economically stressed areas in the state, and perhaps the country, all Lyon County departments have faced very tight budget limitations for the past several years – with a number of staff reductions, cutbacks in hours and equipment/material limitations.  Services throughout the county have been severely strained.

Sheriff Veil, who in past budget battles has shown antagonistic behavior to the stringent budget limitations, proposed some hefty staffing increases (50 new employees) and additional equipment and equipment upgrades.

Veil’s fiscal year 2014-15 requests for his four budget responsibilities, if granted, would have been a $3.9 million (35%) increase over his current budget.

And, during this past budget session, he was, once again, asked to eliminate the position of Under Sheriff. Sheriff Veil emphatically argued it was a necessary position.

  • Suing the County because non-union (at-will) employees did not get a merit pay increase:

This dispute arose from a July 19, 2012 vote (3-1) by the Lyon County Board of Commissioners to freeze a 2.5 percent merit pay increase for non-union employees.

A formal complaint was then filed against the Board of Commissioners, County Manager and County Comptroller, on behalf of the affected employees by their elected supervisors – Lyon County District Attorney Robert Auer and Sheriff Alan Veil. The complaint was filed through the private law office of plaintiff Assistant District Attorney Mark Krueger (appointed by District Attorney Auer), charging the July 19 vote was contrary to state and county policies.

When final agreements were reached with the two bargaining units, the Employee’s Association agreed to forego the 2.5 percent merit increase. The Sheriff’s Employees Association, however, pushed for and received the 2.5 percent merit increase.

However, since the inception of the employee associations in Lyon County over 30 years ago, non-association (appointive, at-will) personnel have been granted the same benefits/lack of benefits that the Employees Association contract granted – regardless of what the Sheriff’s Employees Association received. Because the appointed officials (Undersheriff, Assistant DA and others) did not get the increase the Sheriff’s Association employees did, the Sheriff and District Attorney did not agree this 30-year policy should be followed through with. (No complaints were ever filed in those years when the Employees Association got an increase and the Sheriff’s Association did not!)

Following the filing of the complaint, the Board of Commissioners on August 16 authorized County Manager Page to hire an attorney. The County hired Madelyn Shipman of Laxalt – Nomura. Her contract rates were $200.00/hour for her; $175.00/hour for an assistant attorney (if needed); and, $100.00/hour for a paralegal (if needed). I do not know the total cost to the county resulting from this complaint.

The suit was rejected upon appeal by the County – with the 3rd Judicial Court basing its decision on the filing of a suit by the District Attorney or on behalf of the District Attorney violates NRS. This negated any further action.

  • Open Meeting Law violation charged:

In September 2012, Sheriff Allan Veil also filed an Open Meeting Law complaint with the State Attorney General’s office charging the Lyon County Commission Chair did not offer an opportunity for public input prior to the commission’s vote on September 6, 2012 to deny the claim filed against the County asking for a 2.5 percent merit pay increase for certain non-Association employees in fiscal year 2013.

Review of the tapes of that meeting contradicted Veil’s charges and no ethics violations were found.

Think about it…..

Nancy Dallas, Editor/Publisher

NewsDesk (Est. January 2003)

www.ndbynd.com


Posted in Editorials
3 comments on “Commentary – Lyon County Sheriff’s political maneuvering an insult to Lyon County residents
  1. Reverend Yosef Mustafanos says:

    The Sheriff’s Department leadership, and its deputies, have no respect for the political process. Neither do they have respect for the citizens whom which they serve. Nor do they have respect for community leaders such as pastors of churches. The Lyon County Sheriff’s Department, has shown no respect for God and country. The department has denied a religious chaplain program to serve the inmates. Influencing inmates with the teachings of Jesus Christ will certainly speak to their conscience and praesent aftercare when released from incarceration. Deputies have used revolting and disrespectful words regarding political leadership, who signed their paychecks and religious leaders who has committed themselves in addressing moral conduct and behavior amongst the citizens of Lyon County. Does the sheriff’s department employees feel that they are the supreme governors over Lyon County? That they answer to no one? its not only Sheriff Veil who holds this arrogant egotistical high and mighty mindset, but the Sheriff’s Captains perpetuate this form of thinking and it is communicated all the way down to patrol deputies. This behavior is difficult to root out if it is even possible to root out, because the sheriffs Association fights hard to preserve this mindset. If the newly elected sheriff, AL McNeil does not fight hard to root these corrupted thinkers out of the sheriff’s department, then the Lyon County Board of Commissioners will have to deal with countless lawsuits from the citizens of Lyon County. when the state and county make laws that preserve corrupt minded employees, eventually they hit the wall where a decision must be made. Either establish laws and policies that does not tolerate corrupt, single-minded, greedy, power hungry employees, or go broke hanging on to them. One thing that I have learned over the years is: Giving an employee more money, does not make that employee loyal, hard working, dedicated, committed, faithful, responsible, honest, and honorable. The employee must have those attributes instilled in him or her before hiring them for the job.

    Totally disgusted,
    Reverend Yosef Mustafanos

  2. politicalphd says:

    Don’t forget ventriloquism, the ability for one person to open their mouth, and have another person’s voice, and commands spill right out. A lot of people have that thought, that Albert would open his mouth, and Alan’s voice would come out.

    I don’t figure that will ever happen with Alvin, and, that is what the other two “Al’s” just do not like at all. .

  3. Robert H. Rowley says:

    I believe this is one of the many reasons the voters of Lyon County voted for Al McNeil as their Sheriff, an individual who understands the importance of using taxpayers dollars in a way that is most effective. The ability to work with the County Manager and Comptroller is vital to sustaining lower taxes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*